spectup logo Request Call
/ Resource hub Private Placements & Institutional Updated 18 min read

What Is a Private Equity Placement Agent?

A private equity placement agent raises LP commitments for a GP. What it does, how the retainer and placement fee work, who pays, and US broker-dealer rules.

Abstract glass bowl catching a falling line of droplets, cover for a guide to the private equity placement agent
Edwin Mik
Edwin MikPartner & Head of IR

Formerly at Barclays, Apax Partners and Euronext, Edwin knows how investors screen a mandate. He works out who is allocating now, which of the 440+ relationships is the right first call, and what they need to see.

LinkedIn
What this covers
01The mandate covers five workstreams to close

Raise parameters, positioning, materials, LP targeting and outreach, then diligence and close; spectup's published process runs eight to twelve months.

02Fees: monthly retainer plus a capped placement fee

The placement fee is a percentage of capital that closes; the investor-credit schedule and the tail decide which commitments it applies to.

03ILPA puts the fee on the fund manager

Placement agent fees are borne by the GP; where they are charged to the fund, ILPA expects the management fee to be fully offset.

04US broker-dealer registration and Rule 15a-6

The SEC lists placement agents among persons who may need to register; a non-US agent reaches US institutions through a registered broker-dealer.

05A six-question checklist before you sign

Named LPs at your ticket size, the team on the mandate, registration, investor credit and tail, ownership of the LP list, and conflicts.

LPs give first meetings to managers they already know, so a GP raising a fund without that history has a problem no deck solves. A private equity placement agent is the firm the GP mandates to solve it: it builds the LP list, prepares the materials, runs the meetings to close, and is paid a retainer plus a fee on capital that closes.

This guide is for GPs raising a vehicle of $50M or more, and for CFOs and owners running an institutional private placement for a company or a listed issuer.

spectup works as a private placement agent for funds and companies, on one side only: mandated by the GP or the issuer, paid by that side, with the LPs and investors brought to the table.

spectup's published process runs a placement eight to twelve months from mandate to close, depending on the size of the raise, and the stages overlap.

Figure 01Five weeks of preparation, then outreach that runs to the closespectup's published placement process, by week and month (M8 = month 8) from the signed mandate. The close falls in months 8 to 12.
Five weeks of preparation, then outreach that runs to the closeTimeline on a time axis. Mandate and raise parameters; Week 1; 0 to 1 weeks. Positioning; Weeks 2 to 3; 1 to 3 weeks. Materials: PPM, deck, data room; Weeks 3 to 5; 2 to 5 weeks. Target list and LP outreach; Week 5 onward; 4 to 52 weeks. Term sheet, diligence, signing; Month 8 to 12; 30 to 52 weeks.MandateM8M12Mandate andraise parametersWeek 1PositioningWeeks 2 to 3Materials: PPM,deck, data roomWeeks 3 to 5Target list and LP outreachWeek 5 onwardTerm sheet,diligence, signingMonth 8 to 12Five weeks of preparation, then outreach that runs to the closeTimeline on a time axis. Mandate and raise parameters; Week 1; 0 to 1 weeks. Positioning; Weeks 2 to 3; 1 to 3 weeks. Materials: PPM, deck, data room; Weeks 3 to 5; 2 to 5 weeks. Target list and LP outreach; Week 5 onward; 4 to 52 weeks. Term sheet, diligence, signing; Month 8 to 12; 30 to 52 weeks.MandateM8M12Mandate and raise parametersWeek 1PositioningWeeks 2 to 3Materials: PPM, deck, data roomWeeks 3 to 5Target list and LP outreachWeek 5 onwardTerm sheet, diligence, signingMonth 8 to 12
Figure 01 data: Five weeks of preparation, then outreach that runs to the close
TrackWhatWhen
Mandate and raise parametersWeek 10 to 1 weeks
PositioningWeeks 2 to 31 to 3 weeks
Materials: PPM, deck, data roomWeeks 3 to 52 to 5 weeks
Target list and LP outreachWeek 5 onward4 to 52 weeks
Term sheet, diligence, signingMonth 8 to 1230 to 52 weeks
Source: spectup's published placement process, /private-placement-agent.

What does a private equity placement agent do?

What is a placement agent? ILPA's private equity glossary defines it as a company that specialises in finding institutional investors willing and able to invest in a private equity fund or a company issuing securities. The same entry gives the reason a GP hires one: so the fund's partners can focus on management issues rather than on raising capital.

The agent acts for the fund, never invests itself, and never represents the LPs it approaches. Its output is LP meetings that turn into commitments, and five workstreams produce them.

  1. Mandate and raise parameters. Target size, hard cap, minimum ticket, the LP types the strategy fits and the countries the fund can legally be marketed in.

  2. Positioning. The equity story: why this strategy, why this team, and what the track record proves against the other managers an LP is looking at in the same strategy.

  3. Materials. The private placement memorandum, the LP deck, the model, the due diligence questionnaire (DDQ, the standard LP question set) and the data room.

  4. Target list and outreach. LPs ranked by fit: strategy, ticket size, where each one sits in its commitment cycle and who inside it owns the decision.

  5. Diligence and close. The LP's follow-up questions, side letters and the mechanics of the first close (the date the fund accepts its first commitments), then the next close behind it.

The work is in the sequencing: which LP hears about the fund first, which one waits for a reference from the first, and which one is never approached because its mandate excludes the strategy.

What does a placement agent do that a GP's own IR team has no time for? It runs a new-LP campaign full time. An IR team also runs reporting, capital calls and the annual meeting for the LPs already in the fund, and a campaign to dozens of new LPs is a separate job with its own calendar.

Placement agents, underwriters and capital introduction: what is the difference?

Six kinds of firm sit near a private raise. They differ on who mandates the firm, what it does with the securities and how it's paid.

Firm

Mandated by

What it does

How it's paid

Placement agent

Private equity and other fund GPs, or the issuing company

Places securities privately with institutional investors; doesn't buy them

Retainer plus a fee on capital that closes

Underwriter

The issuer in a public offering

Buys or guarantees the issue and resells it to the market

A fee on the offering

Full-service investment bank

Issuers, companies and funds

Runs public offerings, M&A and trading as well as private placements

A fee per product line

Capital introduction

A hedge fund manager, through its prime broker

Introduces the manager to allocators, bundled with prime brokerage

Through trading, not a separate mandate fee

Finder

Anyone who pays it

Introduces investors without running the process

A finder's fee; transaction-based pay can mean broker registration

Asset manager or GP

Its own LPs

Invests the capital the LPs commit

Management fee and carried interest (the GP's share of profits)

What separates an agent from an underwriter is who owns the securities. An underwriter takes the issue onto its own book in a public offering; the agent never owns the fund interests it places, and a private fund isn't sold through a public offering at all.

The asset manager and the agent sit on the same side of a fund raise and do different jobs: the manager invests the capital, and the agent finds the LPs who commit it.

A full-service bank also runs a private funds group, so the test is the mandate: an agent is mandated specifically to place securities privately, and that's the whole of its job on the raise.

Why is raising a private equity fund harder in 2026?

In 2025 buyout fund-raising fell 16% to $395 billion, and the number of funds closed fell 18% for the industry as a whole and 23% for buyout, a fourth straight year of decline in Bain & Company's Global Private Equity Report 2026.

Figure 02Buyout funds closed fell 23% in 2025, a steeper fall than buyout capital raisedFall from 2024 to 2025, per cent: buyout capital raised, and the number of funds closed.
Buyout funds closed fell 23% in 2025, a steeper fall than buyout capital raisedBar chart. Buyout capital raised, to $395 billion; 16%. Funds closed, industry as a whole; 18%. Buyout funds closed; 23%.0%5%10%15%20%25%Buyout capital raised,to $395 billion16%Funds closed,industry as a whole18%Buyout funds closed23%A fourth straight year of declineBuyout funds closed fell 23% in 2025, a steeper fall than buyout capital raisedBar chart. Buyout capital raised, to $395 billion; 16%. Funds closed, industry as a whole; 18%. Buyout funds closed; 23%.0%10%20%30%Buyout capital raised, to $395 billion16%Funds closed, industry as a whole18%Buyout funds closed23%A fourth straight year of decline
Figure 02 data: Buyout funds closed fell 23% in 2025, a steeper fall than buyout capital raised
ItemValue
Buyout capital raised, to $395 billion16%
Funds closed, industry as a whole18%
Buyout funds closed23%
Source: Bain & Company, Global Private Equity Report 2026, as cited above.

The same report names the driver: lagging distributions to LPs. An LP that isn't getting cash back from older funds can't commit to new ones at the old pace, even where its target allocation to private equity hasn't changed.

Bain also finds that a majority of LPs still expect to maintain or increase their allocations to private equity. Their constraint is cash: the LPs with room this year are the ones whose older funds are distributing.

An LP with less cash coming back re-ups with the managers who returned capital and gives fewer first meetings to new names. A smaller or newer fund feels this most, because a re-up is the cheapest decision an LP makes; a manager the LP has never backed asks for diligence it has to staff from scratch, and in a year of constrained commitments that diligence goes to fewer managers.

A strong track record earns the deck a read. Whether it earns a meeting depends on whether the LP has room in this year's commitment budget, so in 2026 the agent worth its fee is the one with a route into those LPs, timed to the months when they have it.

When should a GP hire a private equity placement agent?

An agent's fee only pays for itself where the GP's own relationships stop. Four situations put a fund there, and one keeps it out.

  • A first or second fund without an LP base that re-ups, where most commitments have to come from LPs who've never met the team.

  • A new LP geography, such as a European GP reaching US institutions, which also brings in the US registration question covered below.

  • An LP count the team can't work alongside deployment: dozens of first meetings, each followed by its own diligence.

  • A strategy outside an LP's usual box, where the agent's job is to find the allocators whose mandate fits it at all.

The case against is a re-up-led raise where the existing LPs fill most of the fund. The fee then lands on capital the GP would have raised anyway, unless the existing LPs are written out of the fee base.

From the desk. spectup's record across its mandates: $760M+ advised, raised or placed.

We asked an institutional LP how a manager gets a first meeting today. His answers: no new manager relationships, re-ups if anything; about one new fund deck a month; diligence of a month or so; and first meetings go to "a relationship with someone I trust". A placement agent exists to be that relationship.

How placement agent fees are structured

A placement agent fee has two parts the GP sees on the invoice and three terms that decide what the GP ends up paying. The placement agent agreement (the mandate letter between the GP and the agent) sets all five.

Component

How it's set

What to negotiate

Retainer

A monthly fee while the placement runs

What it covers, and whether it's credited against the placement fee

Placement fee

A percentage of capital that closes, capped in the mandate

Which commitments count, and the cap

Investor credit

The schedule of LPs the agent is paid on

A named list, with existing LPs excluded

Tail

A fee on introduced LPs who commit after the term ends

Only LPs the agent introduced, for a fixed period

Expenses and exclusivity

Travel and data room costs; whether the agent is the only one

An expense cap; exclusivity by geography or LP type

The investor-credit schedule matters more than the rate. An agent paid on "any LP we contacted" can claim a commitment from an LP the GP already knew, and the fee then follows capital the agent didn't raise.

The tail protects the agent against a GP who ends the mandate the week before a large LP signs. It's fair when it's limited to LPs the agent introduced and named in writing, and it isn't fair when it reaches every LP on the original target list.

Who pays is settled in the limited partnership agreement, and LPs have a published position on it.

ILPA's Principles say placement agent fees should be borne by the fund manager and placement expenses by the fund, and where the fees are charged to the fund, the management fee should be fully offset. The same principles ask the GP to disclose its arrangement with its placement agents in the diligence materials.

An LP who finds the fee charged to the fund without a full offset reads it as the LPs paying for the GP's fund-raising, and raises it in diligence.

On spectup's mandates the retainer and the placement fee are set against the instrument, the size and the jurisdictions, and agreed before work starts. The retainer covers the desk, the materials and the investor outreach, at the same fee every month of the term.

The cost runs in two stages: eight to twelve monthly retainers while the placement runs, then one placement fee on capital that closes. If nothing closes, there's no placement fee and the retainers are the whole cost.

Illustrative example: $100M of commitments, under a mandate that writes out the GP's existing LPs and pays only on LPs the agent introduced and named. If existing LPs commit $40M, LPs the agent didn't introduce and name commit $15M, and introduced LPs commit $5M after the tail ends, the placement fee is paid on the remaining $40M.

Figure 03IllustrativeOn an illustrative $100M fund, the mandate's terms cut the placement fee base to $40MCommitments to the fund, and the part the placement fee is paid on, $M.
On an illustrative $100M fund, the mandate's terms cut the placement fee base to $40MWaterfall chart. Every commitment; $100M. Existing LPs written out; −$40M; $60M. Not on the credit schedule; −$15M; $45M. Committed after the tail; −$5M; $40M. Fee base; $40M.$0$20M$40M$60M$80M$100M$100MEverycommitment−$40MExisting LPswritten out−$15MNot on thecredit schedule−$5MCommittedafter the tail$40MFee baseOn an illustrative $100M fund, the mandate's terms cut the placement fee base to $40MWaterfall chart. Every commitment; $100M. Existing LPs written out; −$40M; $60M. Not on the credit schedule; −$15M; $45M. Committed after the tail; −$5M; $40M. Fee base; $40M.$0$25M$50M$75M$100MEvery commitment$100MExisting LPs written out−$40MNot on the credit schedule−$15MCommitted after the tail−$5MFee base$40M
Figure 03 data: On an illustrative $100M fund, the mandate's terms cut the placement fee base to $40M
StepChangeRunning total
Every commitment$100M
Existing LPs written out−$40M$60M
Not on the credit schedule−$15M$45M
Committed after the tail−$5M$40M
Fee base$40M
Illustrative example in this section.

Does a placement agent need to be a registered broker-dealer?

The answer turns on what a private equity placement agent does, how it's paid and where it sits: inside the US or outside it. Put the question to the agent in the first meeting, before a mandate is signed.

The SEC's guide to broker-dealer registration lists persons that act as placement agents for private placements among those who may need to register, and says that selling securities exempt under Regulation D doesn't exempt the agent from registering. Its test asks whether a firm's compensation depends on the outcome or size of the deal, which is how a placement fee works.

Four regimes come up on a fund raise with LPs in more than one country.

  • US registration. A US agent paid on transaction-based terms should be registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer and be a FINRA member; its record is on FINRA's BrokerCheck.

  • Rule 15a-6 for a non-US agent. Rule 15a-6 lets a foreign firm approach US institutional investors when the resulting transactions go through a registered broker or dealer. spectup's US-related activity runs this way, through a chaperoning arrangement with a US registered broker-dealer that's a FINRA and SIPC member.

  • FINRA filing. Under FINRA Rule 5123, a member firm selling a private placement files the offering documents with FINRA within 15 calendar days of the first sale.

  • UK marketing. An AIFM marketing a fund in the UK under the national private placement regime (NPPR, the UK route for funds without a marketing passport) notifies the FCA first, and can start marketing once the FCA has received the notification.

Chaperoning under the rule means the non-US agent's people work from outside the US, and when they visit a US institution, an associated person of the registered broker-dealer goes with them and accepts responsibility for what's said. Any resulting transaction is effected through that broker-dealer, not through the agent.

For a non-US agent, ask which US broker-dealer chaperones it and ask to see the arrangement. If neither comes back when you ask, the US LPs aren't on its list. The arrangement should name a registered broker-dealer, show its FINRA membership on BrokerCheck, and put any resulting US transaction through that firm.

Figure 04Under Rule 15a-6 a US broker-dealer chaperones a non-US agent and effects the transactionWho goes into the meeting, and who the transaction runs through, when a non-US placement agent approaches a US institution.
Under Rule 15a-6 a US broker-dealer chaperones a non-US agent and effects the transactionFlow diagram. Non-US placement agent (Works from outside the US); Visit to a US institution. US registered broker-dealer (FINRA member, on BrokerCheck); Visit to a US institution; The transaction [effects it]. Visit to a US institution (With the broker-dealer's person); US institutional investor. US institutional investor; The transaction [commits]. The transaction (Through the broker-dealer); end.commitseffects itNon-US placement agentWorks from outside the USUS registered broker-dealerFINRA member, on BrokerCheckVisit to a US institutionWith the broker-dealer's personUS institutional investorThe transactionThrough the broker-dealerUnder Rule 15a-6 a US broker-dealer chaperones a non-US agent and effects the transactionFlow diagram. Non-US placement agent (Works from outside the US); Visit to a US institution. US registered broker-dealer (FINRA member, on BrokerCheck); Visit to a US institution; The transaction [effects it]. Visit to a US institution (With the broker-dealer's person); US institutional investor. US institutional investor; The transaction [commits]. The transaction (Through the broker-dealer); end.commitseffects itNon-USplacement agentWorks fromoutside the USUS registeredbroker-dealerFINRA member,on BrokerCheckVisit to a US institutionWith the broker-dealer's personUS institutional investorThe transactionThrough the broker-dealer
Figure 04 data: Under Rule 15a-6 a US broker-dealer chaperones a non-US agent and effects the transaction
StepLeads to
Non-US placement agent (Works from outside the US)Visit to a US institution
US registered broker-dealer (FINRA member, on BrokerCheck)Visit to a US institution; The transaction [effects it]
Visit to a US institution (With the broker-dealer's person)US institutional investor
US institutional investorThe transaction [commits]
The transaction (Through the broker-dealer)end
Source: SEC Rule 15a-6 (17 CFR 240.15a-6), as cited in this section.

Pay-to-play rules when a public pension is on the list

Under the Advisers Act, Rule 206(4)-5 bars an investment adviser from paying a third party to solicit a government entity, such as a public pension, unless that third party is a regulated person under the rule.

A GP with a state or municipal pension on the target list asks the agent, before signing, whether it qualifies. If it doesn't, those LPs come off the agent's list, and the GP approaches them itself.

Questions to ask before you sign a placement mandate

The first meeting with an agent is diligence in the other direction, and every answer below ends up in the mandate. Put these six to every agent on your shortlist, and ask for the answers in writing.

Ask the agent

A good answer

Which LPs would you approach for this fund, and who at each?

Names at the right ticket size, not a count of relationships. An agent that answers with a number hasn't matched its book to your fund yet.

Who works the mandate day to day?

The names of the people on the outreach and on LP diligence.

Are you registered, and what's your US route?

BrokerCheck for a US firm; the Rule 15a-6 arrangement for a non-US one.

Which investors earn you credit, and how long does the tail run?

A named schedule, existing LPs excluded.

Who owns the LP list and the meeting notes after the term?

The GP. Its next fund starts from them, and an agent that keeps them sells the same access back at the next raise.

Do you take fees from investors, run your own products or hold distribution agreements?

No. Any yes means the agent works more than one side.

spectup answers the last one on its own page: no proprietary products, no fund affiliations and no distribution agreements, mandated by one side and paid by that side only.

A GP who wants a list of placement agents before the first call can start from our ranking of private placement agencies, and then put these six questions to each name on it.

Placement agents for private companies and listed issuers

A fund placement agent and an agent raising for a company run the same mandate with a different investor list and different materials. For companies with revenue and a defined use of proceeds, the placement covers growth equity, structured private debt and recapitalisations.

For listed issuers it covers PIPEs (private investment in public equity), registered directs and follow-on placements, for balance sheet repair, acquisition funding and expansion.

A company's investors read revenue, margins and the use of proceeds; an LP reads the track record, the team and the terms of the fund.

Fund placement

Private company

Listed issuer

Instrument

LP interests in a new vehicle, a continuation fund or a co-invest sleeve

Growth equity, structured private debt, a recapitalisation

PIPE, registered direct, follow-on placement

Investors

Pension funds, endowments, family offices, funds of funds

Growth equity funds, family offices, credit funds

Institutional investors and strategics

What they read first

Track record, team, fund terms

Revenue, margins, use of proceeds

Share price, use of proceeds, the board-approved reason for the raise

Core document

PPM, LP deck, DDQ

Investor deck, model, term sheet

Offering documents and the public filings

LP depth decides more than the fee rate

A fee point saved on a private equity placement agent whose LPs don't write your ticket size costs more than the fee: it costs the months the fund spends in market. I'd test the network before the rate.

Ask the agent to show its network, layer by layer: the LPs it has closed with, the investors it has taken clients in front of, and the partner firms whose LP books open on a shared mandate. spectup's answer is 440+ direct relationships from closed transactions, 2,500+ investors and LPs sat in front of with clients, and 30+ partner firms.

The second test is timing: how the agent knows when an LP's commitment window opens. spectup runs two systems built in-house for it: a signal engine that watches for a fund closing, a mandate being published, a partner moving or an exit freeing capital, and Valicon.ai, spectup's investor platform, which holds primary data from real transactions and what each investor has written before.

Ask the agent how it knows when an LP's commitment window opens.

How spectup runs a fund placement mandate

spectup acts for one side: the GP raising the fund, or the company raising the round. The fund floor is a vehicle of $50M or more, a continuation fund or a co-invest sleeve, with a track record an LP can diligence.

  1. Capital strategy. Target size, LP mix, the countries the fund is marketed in and the order of the closes.

  2. Positioning. The equity story, and the comparison an LP will draw against other managers in the strategy.

  3. Offering materials. PPM, LP deck, model, DDQ and data room.

  4. Investor targeting and outreach. A named target list, warm introductions and signal-triggered outbound across pension funds, endowments and family offices. Each approach is timed by the signal engine and checked against Valicon.ai before it goes out.

  5. Diligence and close. The LP's questions, side letters and the closing mechanics. US-related activity runs under Rule 15a-6 through the chaperoning broker-dealer.

All five are scoped, priced and dated in the mandate before any work starts, and the deliverable of the last one is the signed subscription documents.

spectup turns a mandate down when it doesn't fit the process:

  • A fund under $50M, or a company with no defined use of proceeds.

  • A raise that has to close in weeks, where there's no time for a real process.

  • An introduction-only arrangement, because spectup only takes mandates to run the whole placement.

  • Acting for the investors as well as the issuer, because the firm works one side of a transaction.

Fees are a retainer plus a capped placement fee. Fund formation stays with the client's counsel: spectup doesn't draft the fund documents.

Deciding whether to run the raise in-house or mandate an agent

A raise runs in-house, through a full-service bank's private funds group or through a low and mid-market agent, and the three differ on where each fits, whose investors it reaches and what it costs.

In-house

Full-service bank

Low and mid-market agent

Who runs it

The CFO or the IR lead, alongside the day job

A private funds group

A dedicated desk

Where it fits

Any size, until the list runs out

Larger raises, where the fee supports a full desk

Low and mid-market, where a dedicated desk is the difference

Investor coverage

The relationships the team already has

The bank's institutional distribution

A direct book plus outbound to investors it has no line to yet

Cost

The team's time, or an IR hire: a fixed cost whether the fund closes or not

A larger retainer plus a placement fee

A retainer plus a capped placement fee

Before the first agent call, write down two numbers: how many LPs the fund needs at its average ticket, and how many of those already know you. If the second number covers most of the first, run the raise yourself.

If it doesn't, the gap between the two is the mandate for a private equity placement agent. Take that number into every agent conversation and ask each one which names it would put against it.

/ Insights

Three conclusions

01
LP depth decides more than the fee rate

A fee point saved on an agent whose LPs don't write your ticket size costs months in market. Test the network in layers and ask which named LPs the agent would approach first.

02
Ask to see the US broker-dealer arrangement

A non-US agent reaches US institutions under Rule 15a-6 only through a registered broker-dealer. The arrangement should name the firm, show its FINRA membership on BrokerCheck and put every US transaction through it.

03
An un-offset fee becomes an LP diligence question

Where the fund pays the agent's fee without a full management-fee offset, LPs read it as paying for the GP's fund-raising, and ILPA's Principles back them. Settle who pays in the LPA.

/ Answers

What is a private equity placement agent: questions readers ask

6 questions on private placements and institutional capital, answered by Edwin Mik, Partner & Head of IR.

01What is a placement agent in private equity?

The firm a GP mandates to raise commitments from institutional LPs for a private fund. It runs the LP list, the materials, the meetings and diligence, and is paid on capital that closes.

02What is a typical placement fee for private equity?

The rate is set per mandate against the instrument, the size and the jurisdictions, so what is typical is the structure: a monthly retainer while the placement runs, and a percentage of the capital that closes, capped in the mandate. The tail and the investor-credit schedule decide which commitments the percentage applies to.

03Is a placement agent the same as an underwriter?

No. An underwriter buys or guarantees an issue in a public offering and resells it; the agent places securities privately and never owns them.

04Do placement agents have to register as broker-dealers?

In the US, usually yes. The SEC names placement agents for private placements among the persons who may need to register as brokers, and a fee tied to the size or outcome of the deal is the marker it tests for. A non-US agent can approach US institutional investors under Rule 15a-6 when the resulting transactions go through a registered broker-dealer. In the UK, the fund's AIFM notifies the FCA under the national private placement regime before marketing starts.

05Who pays for placement agents, the GP or the fund?

The GP, on ILPA's principles. Placement agent fees should be borne by the fund manager and placement expenses by the fund; where the fee is charged to the fund, the management fee should be fully offset. The final split is written into the limited partnership agreement.

06When should a GP hire a private placement agent?

When the fund needs more new LPs than the team's own relationships reach: a first or second fund, a new LP geography, or an LP count the team can't work alongside deployment. A re-up-led raise rarely needs one. spectup's private placement agent service takes GP mandates for vehicles of $50M or more, acts for the GP only and is paid by the GP. The fee is a retainer plus a capped placement fee, agreed before any work starts, and US-related activity runs under Rule 15a-6.

Where you are11 sections